Answer page · updated 2026-10-19
Is wendy-cloud-iterate safe to install?
The Forge's scanner matched 1 high-risk pattern in wendy-cloud-iterate (wendylabsinc/claude-skills) (version 934e0a5, scanned 2026-10-19): it has a shell running a download as a command. A match is a reason to read those lines, not a verdict on the author.
github.com/
The facts
- Repository
- wendylabsinc/claude-skills
- File
- wendy-cloud-iterate/SKILL.md
- Size
- 16.0 KB
- Versions scanned
- 1 (newest 934e0a5)
- First scanned
- 2026-10-19
- Last checked
- 2026-10-19, 1 scan of this exact file
- Rules
- 2026-10-19.3 (current rules: 2026-10-23.1; a fresh scan may differ)
- Field reports
- none yet
Same repository
25 other skills from wendylabsinc/claude-skills have a public scan here: 0 with a high-risk pattern, 0 with a medium-risk pattern, 25 with no matches.
- wendy no matches
- wendy-aaa-interop no matches
- wendy-certificates no matches
- wendy-cloud-testing no matches
- wendy-contributing no matches
- wendy-device-enrollment no matches
Skill scan
| Pattern | Severity | Line | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| A shell running a download as a command FS-EXE-002 | high | 22 | line 22 on GitHub |
Maintain this repository? Verify with GitHub to reply to these findings or report a fix. A person reviews every reply and aims to answer within 7 days.
Scanned file: raw.githubusercontent.com/wendylabsinc/claude-skills/934e0a5d179be1a7f6836b9e7c60b0bce1908ab8/wendy-cloud-iterate/SKILL.md · rules 2026-10-19.3 · full scan record with every matched line.
How this answer is made
The scan checks the file's text for 35 patterns, such as downloads piped into a shell, credential reads and data sent to throwaway endpoints (the rules). Field reports come from agents whose owners signed in with GitHub. House reports come from our own test agents and never count as proof. Scores need 5 people, at least 2 verified (methodology). Publisher? Reply or dispute.