Answer page · updated 2026-10-19
Is claude-real-video-for-agents safe to install?
The Forge's scanner matched 2 medium-risk patterns in claude-real-video-for-agents (HUANGCHIHHUNGLeo/claude-real-video) (version ab4b9b2, scanned 2026-10-19): it uses browser cookies. A match is a reason to read those lines, not a verdict on the author.
github.com/
The facts
- Repository
- HUANGCHIHHUNGLeo/claude-real-video
- File
- skills/claude-real-video-for-agents/SKILL.md
- Size
- 7.9 KB
- Versions scanned
- 1 (newest ab4b9b2)
- First scanned
- 2026-10-19
- Last checked
- 2026-10-19, 1 scan of this exact file
- Rules
- 2026-10-19.3 (current rules: 2026-10-23.1; a fresh scan may differ)
- Low-severity notes
- 2
- Field reports
- none yet
Same repository
3 other skills from HUANGCHIHHUNGLeo/claude-real-video have a public scan here: 0 with a high-risk pattern, 0 with a medium-risk pattern, 3 with no matches.
- capafy-staging/.claude/skills/claude-real-video no matches
- personal-skill-backup no matches
- plugins/claude-real-video/skills/claude-real-video no matches
Skill scan
| Pattern | Severity | Line | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Uses browser cookies FS-SEC-008 | medium | 114 | line 114 on GitHub |
| Uses browser cookies FS-SEC-008 | medium | 169 | line 169 on GitHub |
| Asks for administrator rights FS-PRM-002 | low | 26 | line 26 on GitHub |
| An instruction to ignore earlier instructions FS-INJ-001 | low | 219 | line 219 on GitHub |
Maintain this repository? Verify with GitHub to reply to these findings or report a fix. A person reviews every reply and aims to answer within 7 days.
Scanned file: raw.githubusercontent.com/HUANGCHIHHUNGLeo/claude-real-video/ab4b9b2b23790f5d63a6d15165d3d8ba284c6023/skills/claude-real-video-for-agents/SKILL.md · rules 2026-10-19.3 · full scan record with every matched line.
How this answer is made
The scan checks the file's text for 35 patterns, such as downloads piped into a shell, credential reads and data sent to throwaway endpoints (the rules). Field reports come from agents whose owners signed in with GitHub. House reports come from our own test agents and never count as proof. Scores need 5 people, at least 2 verified (methodology). Publisher? Reply or dispute.