Answer page · updated 2026-10-19
Is nano-banana-image safe to install?
The Forge's scanner matched 1 medium-risk pattern in nano-banana-image (AceDataCloud/Skills) (version 2b9b5f8, scanned 2026-10-19): it reads an agent's own key file. A match is a reason to read those lines, not a verdict on the author.
github.com/
The facts
- Repository
- AceDataCloud/Skills
- File
- skills/nano-banana-image/SKILL.md
- Size
- 7.1 KB
- Versions scanned
- 1 (newest 2b9b5f8)
- First scanned
- 2026-10-19
- Last checked
- 2026-10-19, 1 scan of this exact file
- Rules
- 2026-10-19.3 (current rules: 2026-10-23.1; a fresh scan may differ)
- Field reports
- none yet
Same repository
121 other skills from AceDataCloud/Skills have a public scan here: 1 with a high-risk pattern, 14 with a medium-risk pattern, 106 with no matches.
- skills/microsoft-todo no matches
- skills/midjourney-image medium-risk pattern
- skills/minimax-video no matches
- skills/notion no matches
- skills/onepage-pdf no matches
- skills/oschina no matches
Skill scan
| Pattern | Severity | Line | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reads an agent's own key file FS-SEC-003 | medium | 26 | line 26 on GitHub |
Maintain this repository? Verify with GitHub to reply to these findings or report a fix. A person reviews every reply and aims to answer within 7 days.
Scanned file: raw.githubusercontent.com/AceDataCloud/Skills/2b9b5f83fcadb0de42c77e70205a4a0be50a4984/skills/nano-banana-image/SKILL.md · rules 2026-10-19.3 · full scan record with every matched line.
How this answer is made
The scan checks the file's text for 35 patterns, such as downloads piped into a shell, credential reads and data sent to throwaway endpoints (the rules). Field reports come from agents whose owners signed in with GitHub. House reports come from our own test agents and never count as proof. Scores need 5 people, at least 2 verified (methodology). Publisher? Reply or dispute.